Re: Minutes posted from today's meeting
"Kennedy, Smith \(Wireless & IPP Standards\) via ipp" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ipp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Mike, I don't know why this didn't occur to me earlier, but I think this issue is already covered by the "media-sheets-supported" additional member of "finishings-col" defined in section 7.9. 😊 I think we are good with what we have already - no additional attributes needed. Smith > On Aug 5, 2021, at 4:39 PM, Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & IPP Standards) <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi again, > > I guess one other way this might be conveyed is to add a "job-max-pages-per-set-supported" member to "finishings-col" and add that as an additional member of "finishings-col-ready: / "finishings-col-database" collections, so that it can be used by all finishings operations? > finishings-col-database= > > { > > finishing-template='fold-accordion' > > media-size-name="iso_a4_210x297mm" > > job-max-pages-per-set-supported=1 > > folding= > > { > > folding-direction='inward' > > folding-location=7425 > > folding-reference-edge='top' > > }, > > { > > folding-direction='inward' > > folding-location=22275 > > folding-reference-edge='top' > > }, > > { > > folding-direction='outward' > > folding-location=14850 > > folding-reference-edge='top' > > } > > } > > > Smith > > > >> On Aug 3, 2021, at 10:26 AM, Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & IPP Standards) via ipp <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Hi Mike, >> >>> On Aug 3, 2021, at 8:20 AM, Michael Sweet <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> Smith, >>> >>>> On Aug 2, 2021, at 5:53 PM, Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & IPP Standards) <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Mike, >>>> >>>> You have in these minutes this statement about section 5.2.6 "folding (1setOf collection)": >>>> >>>> ⁃ Add something to talk about folding applying to the set, except as noted (e.g. poster fold is normally done to individual sheets) >>>> >>>> I'm not sure what to do about this because the . Are you saying that the size of the Set or how many Media Sheets should be folded may depend on the type of the fold? So if the Client sends a 4 page document and supplies "finishing" = 'fold-poster', the Printer might fold every Media Sheet, but if the Client instead supplies "finishing" = 'fold-half' the Printer may instead fold all 4 pages together? >>>> >>>> Maybe we need to add a "folding-when"? >>> >>> >>> So the issue here is that some kinds of folds can be applied per-sheet or per-set, but some can *only* be applied per set (fold-double-gate, fold-parallel), others can *only* be applied per sheet (fold-half-z, fold-poster), and the rest can be applied either way depending on the amount of folding done and output bin/tray. >>> >>> Look at figure 1's fold images to get a visual sense of this - folds along both axis need to be applied per-sheet, while overlapping folds need to be applied per-set. So this is definitely implementation/process-specific, but we want folding to only express the intent. >> >> As you know well, we have two needs: describing a folding operation to a Client, and describing a custom folding operation to the Printer. >> >> In both cases, a “folding-when” would be useful. The Client needs to know the range of options it could use (1 or more than 1 option). And if there is the possibility of a choice, the Client needs a member to convey that choice to the Printer. >> >> Expressing this via the current finishings-col is going to be a little bit awkward because folding is expressed as an ordered sequence of folding collections. Maybe a”folding-when” as a member of the first “folding” collection? Or as a separate peer to “folding”? >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ipp mailing list >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp > _______________________________________________ ipp mailing list [email protected] https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEX4TM/E2Pr7lTZzy2qskbKLDW1N0FAmEMsSEACgkQqskbKLDW 1N2N4g//cHf149jtr9sx49i+jY1p9Qog1LI2xlJ1yThLoAXIcWcNFMDlsmUe+Qhm 42HZn/b73UWqUU4iu2i2PfJjQ6n49USQ8OAFCTkpMe/miv4NtCuiY+eZb2VT5Qyf TT1zNndv4Z0aLZIINcL7fvUrKfsL8aPxBjxI1rTYSEF6C0r6B82v629Pw5SJgcs6 0pI23wh4C4Z7an2zRhISg6NoT+ZYrRKL3vExPs46+O8Ea97hVZi38P9V0I1L5a8z w6Zov7j3NLzfOSWJgiW3HJjXvMl7+/zL03TIvjigpMfWZ61shLRjqsXmx5cnJso1 LsXAGdnCEzasWvKJUoymYnZ6+4DgJHjYgyzz12WyLWfgEOflxjAdLqpPk0SO4a8u eNb6BZzextck/6X9w+J0hTOUQlBItJ+qr6fHZkliDtwO/8DOv4BA23Sp47qjqwlE u+uEHgx68c4yO4HrRQLLXWl7XdDsNgKdeqreGr9N6++2AIjZaLOWA1hzYrj6pykd KWx/m2/5ML2xGXi8z1OHgXoJawydGWEp17745BUtXhJOy1wMf+Tlx/vUEYnQAjWn aHl254vOrN9jazZx9g8JVvYy6KzUUsT9Q1O480gzqXqnbNtDh+HqSNfsB2cS3YSR daxt1HnT7hdmWPrlT9EWYNgEYu9x6a1oDZyXZxZmvyCXpyuAVWI= =XbLo -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----