Re: Minutes posted from today's meeting

"Kennedy, Smith \(Wireless & IPP Standards\) via ipp" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ipp
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Mike,

I don't know why this didn't occur to me earlier, but I think this issue is already covered by the "media-sheets-supported" additional member of "finishings-col" defined in section 7.9. 😊 I think we are good with what we have already - no additional attributes needed.

Smith



> On Aug 5, 2021, at 4:39 PM, Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & IPP Standards) <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi again,
> 
> I guess one other way this might be conveyed is to add a "job-max-pages-per-set-supported" member to "finishings-col" and add that as an additional member of "finishings-col-ready: / "finishings-col-database" collections, so that it can be used by all finishings operations?
> finishings-col-database=
> 
> {
> 
>     finishing-template='fold-accordion'
> 
>     media-size-name="iso_a4_210x297mm"
> 
>     job-max-pages-per-set-supported=1
> 
>     folding=
> 
>     {
> 
>         folding-direction='inward'
> 
>         folding-location=7425
> 
>         folding-reference-edge='top'
> 
>     },
> 
>     {
> 
>         folding-direction='inward'
> 
>         folding-location=22275
> 
>         folding-reference-edge='top'
> 
>     },
> 
>     {
> 
>         folding-direction='outward'
> 
>         folding-location=14850
> 
>         folding-reference-edge='top'
> 
>     }
> 
> }
> 
> 
> Smith
> 
> 
> 
>> On Aug 3, 2021, at 10:26 AM, Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & IPP Standards) via ipp <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Mike,
>> 
>>> On Aug 3, 2021, at 8:20 AM, Michael Sweet <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>  Smith,
>>> 
>>>> On Aug 2, 2021, at 5:53 PM, Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & IPP Standards) <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi Mike,
>>>> 
>>>> You have in these minutes this statement about section 5.2.6 "folding (1setOf collection)":
>>>> 
>>>> ⁃ Add something to talk about folding applying to the set, except as noted (e.g. poster fold is normally done to individual sheets)
>>>> 
>>>> I'm not sure what to do about this because the . Are you saying that the size of the Set or how many Media Sheets should be folded may depend on the type of the fold? So if the Client sends a 4 page document and supplies "finishing" = 'fold-poster', the Printer might fold every Media Sheet, but if the Client instead supplies "finishing" = 'fold-half' the Printer may instead fold all 4 pages together?
>>>> 
>>>> Maybe we need to add a "folding-when"?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> So the issue here is that some kinds of folds can be applied per-sheet or per-set, but some can *only* be applied per set (fold-double-gate, fold-parallel), others can *only* be applied per sheet (fold-half-z, fold-poster), and the rest can be applied either way depending on the amount of folding done and output bin/tray.
>>> 
>>> Look at figure 1's fold images to get a visual sense of this - folds along both axis need to be applied per-sheet, while overlapping folds need to be applied per-set.  So this is definitely implementation/process-specific, but we want folding to only express the intent.
>> 
>> As you know well, we have two needs: describing a folding operation to a Client, and describing a custom folding operation to the Printer.
>> 
>> In both cases, a “folding-when” would be useful. The Client needs to know the range of options it could use (1 or more than 1 option). And if there is the possibility of a choice, the Client needs a member to convey that choice to the Printer.
>> 
>> Expressing this via the current finishings-col is going to be a little bit awkward because folding is expressed as an ordered sequence of folding collections. Maybe a”folding-when” as a member of the first “folding” collection? Or as a separate peer to “folding”?
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> ipp mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp
>

_______________________________________________
ipp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=XbLo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.