Re: Updated IPPBASE draft posted
ISTO-PWG Internet Printing Protocol workgroup discussion forum via ipp <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ipp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
All, Ira noticed these links are broken. The corrected links should be: https://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippbase23-20220124.docx https://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippbase23-20220124.pdf https://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippbase23-20220124-rev.pdf > On Jan 24, 2022, at 6:16 PM, Michael Sweet via ipp <[email protected]> wrote: > > Signed PGP part > All, > > I have posted an updated interim draft of the IPP/2.x specification to: > > https://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippbase20-20220124.docx > https://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippbase20-20220124.pdf > https://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippbase20-20220124-rev.pdf > > ________________________ > Michael Sweet > > > > > ________________________ Michael Sweet _______________________________________________ ipp mailing list [email protected] https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEkIbDzcZsP1Y8+PQFvmfHXsgfMkQFAmHx9CQACgkQvmfHXsgf MkSSoQ//djy/noTmw8A4SIY9nPeN7FU9WbD92aZb2elgNr7Kh0IqWq18GzHgE9O8 giix3rhTVnLGd3ChWyeImVL5YqTsHsrobVb3Vzv9mq9ys+/xEwNcJvBzxDCg2+eL 5YW8DF4yeaBA9QDfvqOt9TajvYrDQdKiLaPL6NI8ctNGhiYdQo8tE+L6bSKbsG47 45V/tai1ovRbc+DLzVGzjl1XdiPl4cgqRN+GnVqtqmYutn9xuqHqXEoWfPUPd4X2 yN1q/Au6bKb0v+MhrXVqi1RfUzxqP5kNwN9KlQl5Mtb9Lyc6xv8Jacl0oYzyEAxH /uG/TAyaXAv9OgDMQzxSbdRpBxbHg+NsqdFNqFrTouCO1PFWH154tdL26D4JtW6M 5Q11unDe63p6tWfZD+HXemLHuB9S30TYSXznBqrJPoN6ZamGtfzHU01eA9IUn3o5 WPYDazoC06ICp0919DRfauMsYLgpYmDrXOv7ymVUsEjmO5eFCLCimQHVngvbcwuK sfaEyVWksMAfz+IO3vSPu7oM8JueDDY3vpfhrfEvPHcEKTmLN7qyn2VSrVUAvYJA l3t897avVxUbrPxk1yqUEMG9zOoXdL200mempuiur8etKpJfyBPA+EBmN4fYk1bf qg2tFlR9hjMgHhzaXI8CpBUtDsvneGsr9w0QfcK9w0lUWJPhomE= =v/5y -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----