Re: LCRC Draft of IPP Finishings v3.0 posted

ISTO-PWG Internet Printing Protocol workgroup discussion forum via ipp <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ipp
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Smith,

You might also fix in your announcement the following two cut-and-paste
errors:

"If there are no objections to the resolutions in the latter document, and
the PWS Steering Committee has no objections to the PWG Last Call process
for IPP Authentication Methods, it should be ready for the next step in the
approval process (PWG Call for Objections or PWG Formal Approval - not sure
which to use in this case, but I think the former)."

Wrong spec name and of course you can't Call for Objects to approve a major
version of a spec.

Cheers,
- Ira


*Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)*

*Chair - SAE Trust Anchors and Authentication TF*
*Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG*

*Co-Chair - TCG Metadata Access Protocol SG*








*Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WGSecretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer
Working GroupCo-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG Internet Printing Protocol WGIETF
Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIBBlue Roof Music / High North
Inchttp://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic
<http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic>http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
<http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc>mailto: [email protected]
<[email protected]>(permanent) PO Box 221  Grand Marais, MI 49839
906-494-2434*


On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 3:38 PM ISTO-PWG Internet Printing Protocol
workgroup discussion forum via ipp <[email protected]> wrote:

> All,
>
> I missed that Mike had comments, so I will be posting an updated LCRC
> document and new draft later today or tomorrow.
>
> Mike, sorry for the mix-up!
>
> Smith
>
> /**
>     Smith Kennedy
>     HP Inc.
> */
>
> On Mar 29, 2022, at 1:53 PM, ISTO-PWG Internet Printing Protocol workgroup
> discussion forum via ipp <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Signed PGP part
> Greetings,
>
> I have posted the LCRC draft of the IPP Finishings v3.0 (FIN) to the PWG
> FTP site, following the completion of the PWG Last Call. The updated
> revision is here:
>
>    https://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippfinishings30-20220329.pdf
>    https://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippfinishings30-20220329.docx
>    https://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippfinishings30-20220329-rev.pdf
>    https://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippfinishings30-20220329-rev.docx
>
> The last call comments are summarized with their resolutions here:
>
>    https://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/lcrc-ippfinishings30.txt
>
> If there are no objections to the resolutions in the latter document, and
> the PWS Steering Committee has no objections to the PWG Last Call process
> for IPP Authentication Methods, it should be ready for the next step in the
> approval process (PWG Call for Objections or PWG Formal Approval - not sure
> which to use in this case, but I think the former).
>
> Cheers,
>
> Smith
>
> /**
>     Smith Kennedy
>     HP Inc.
> */
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp
>

_______________________________________________
ipp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.