Re: Update IANA registry in advance of errata resolution for Issue #113?

Hi Smith,

I agree with your suggestion.  I also agree with Mike that we should
explicitly document
our rationale for the range starting at 0.

We don't have an IPP WG call until 7 July (10 days from now).  We can
certainly discuss
this proposal first on that call, if that suits everyone?

Cheers,
- Ira

*Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)*

*Chair - SAE Trust Anchors and Authentication TF*
*Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG*

*Co-Chair - TCG Metadata Access Protocol SG*








*Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WGSecretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer
Working GroupCo-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG Internet Printing Protocol WGIETF
Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIBBlue Roof Music / High North
Inchttp://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic
<http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic>http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
<http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc>mailto: [email protected]
<[email protected]>(permanent) PO Box 221  Grand Marais, MI 49839
906-494-2434*


On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 9:40 AM Michael Sweet via ipp <[email protected]> wrote:

> Smith,
>
> I'm generally in favor of this, although I want to do a bit more research
> to determine why the current registration has the rangeOfInteger(0,MAX)
> syntax - I have a vague feeling there was a reason for this (tied to MSN's
> roll limits) but we should be consistent and document the reasons for the
> range so there is no confusion going forward.
>
>
> > On Jun 23, 2022, at 4:50 PM, Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & IPP Standards)
> via ipp <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Signed PGP part
> > Greetings,
> >
> > In advance of an erratum resolution in PWG 5100.7 for Issue #113 (
> https://www.pwg.org/dynamo/issues.php?L113+P-1+S-2+I0+E0+Z67+Q), HP Inc.
> is requesting updating the registration of the "media-size" members of
> "media-col-database" and "media-col-ready" to also list the
> "rangeOfInteger" syntax in addition to the current "integer" syntax. HP
> Inc. is also requesting that the definitions specify a lower bounds of 0
> instead of 1 for the "x-dimension" and "y-dimension" members of
> "media-col-database" and "media-col-ready" to match the member definitions
> in the "media-col" Job Template attribute.
> >
> > The current registration listed on pages 58 and 60 of PWG 5100.7-2019
> are:
> >
> > media-col-database (1setOf collection)
> >   <Any "media-col" member attribute>
> >   media-source-properties (collection)
> >     media-source-feed-direction (type2 keyword)
> >     media-source-feed-orientation (type2 enum)
> >
> > media-col-ready (1setOf collection)
> >   <Any "media-col" member attribute>
> >   media-source-properties (collection)
> >     media-source-feed-direction (type2 keyword)
> >     media-source-feed-orientation (type2 enum)
> >
> > media-size-supported (1setOf collection)
> >   x-dimension (integer(1:MAX) | rangeOfInteger(1:MAX))
> >   y-dimension (integer(1:MAX) | rangeOfInteger(1:MAX))
> >
> > If HP Inc.'s requests are followed, the IANA IPP Registry would be
> updated like so (changes in red if you can see color):
> >
> > media-col-database (1setOf collection)
> >   <Any "media-col" member attribute>
> >   media-size (collection)
> >     x-dimension (integer(0:MAX) | rangeOfInteger(0:MAX))
> >     y-dimension (integer(0:MAX) | rangeOfInteger(0:MAX))
> >   media-source-properties (collection)
> >     media-source-feed-direction (type2 keyword)
> >     media-source-feed-orientation (type2 enum)
> >
> > media-col-ready (1setOf collection)
> >   <Any "media-col" member attribute>
> >   media-size (collection)
> >     x-dimension (integer(0:MAX) | rangeOfInteger(0:MAX))
> >     y-dimension (integer(0:MAX) | rangeOfInteger(0:MAX))
> >   media-source-properties (collection)
> >     media-source-feed-direction (type2 keyword)
> >     media-source-feed-orientation (type2 enum)
> >
> > media-size-supported (1setOf collection)
> >   x-dimension (integer(0:MAX) | rangeOfInteger(0:MAX))
> >   y-dimension (integer(0:MAX) | rangeOfInteger(0:MAX))
> >
> >
> > Doing this registration sooner rather than later will help systems that
> generate code from the IANA IPP Registry, such as "jipp".
> >
> > Let me know if there are any objections to this registration via email
> or we can discuss at the next IPP Workgroup call.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Smith
> >
> > /**
> >     Smith Kennedy
> >     HP Inc.
> > */
> >
> >
> >
>
> ________________________
> Michael Sweet
>
> _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp
>

_______________________________________________
ipp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp