Duplicate media sizes in registry...

All,

Zdenek Dohnal (Red Hat) and Benjamin Gordon (Google) have been updating CUPS to support newer registered media size names from the IANA IPP registry.  During the review process we discovered that several duplicate sizes have been registered:

  iso_id-3_88x125mm vs. iso_b7_88x125mm (registered by Canon in 2018)
  om_postfix_114x229mm vs. iso_c6c5_114x229mm (both defined in 5101.1!)
  prc_3_125x176mm vs. iso_b6_125x176mm (both defined in 5101.1!)
  prc_5_110x220mm vs. iso_dl_110x220mm (both defined in 5101.1!)
  prc_10_324x458mm vs. iso_c3_324x458mm (both defined in 5101.1!)

I propose that I remove the first form from the registry in favor of the second to favor ISO paper sizes over national/special purpose sizes.

Thoughts?

________________________
Michael Sweet

_______________________________________________
ipp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=kDuO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----