Re: Add "oauth-authorization-resource" attribute?
Michael Sweet via ipp <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ipp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Smith, I still need to finish updating the wiki for the last meeting's minutes... Anywsyd... > On Nov 7, 2022, at 9:46 PM, Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & IPP Standards) <[email protected]> wrote: > > That sounds right - I couldn't remember how this played out and it doesn't seem to be covered in the wiki page. > > However, I'm worried about that conclusion. If we advise that the Client supplies the "printer-uri" value as the resource identifier, wouldn't this mean that the Authentication Service needs to know the printer's current URI? That could be in the .local domain which isn't really any more useful or verifiable than a printer-uuid value. (Obviously how the printer and Authentication Service talk to one another is outside our scope of concern but that would affect whether the printer could register its URI with the Authentication Service.) > > It seems like we could define the attribute but then provide guidance for how best to use it? OK, so the subject of a "canonical" printer URI was something I've brought up as well. From a standards-perspective the printer advertises its supported URIs, security mechanisms, and authentication methods, so the printer-uri-supported/uri-authentication-supported/uri-security-supported trio and printer/system-xri-supported collection attributes will indicate which URIs to use and which URIs support OAuth. From a security standpoint, the same authentication and security (encryption) methods should be used/supported for all URIs, otherwise you are just creating "back doors". For interoperability you don't want to create a situation where a Client is confused about the URI, authentication, or security that it should use. All that said, I don't think we can design or recommend a configuration where a Client can discover a Printer via mDNS, use a .local hostname, *and* use a cloud/remote OAuth authorization server with token exchange since there is no way to ensure that the printer-uri is globally unique. ________________________ Michael Sweet _______________________________________________ ipp mailing list [email protected] https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEkIbDzcZsP1Y8+PQFvmfHXsgfMkQFAmNqPS8ACgkQvmfHXsgf MkSHAQ//YJcZIdII/QPlXI+c1/XgkQ1XN7lEcHdZgrO1WdrfXgYu1OnydkpyTntM L5hwId5BsTY+nTVeNFz846g5W4MV/FsOyVESzDMlKIqWLn0a79LAmaxHKmdvtyZa 7CVX9CQDEKgnhjAB5NibFnybzLGBy55bNc3JnEmaTYBQW7GXHkNcPbLuHowAOVIN e9Gr2oVn7Xj1gYi3ba81ZzOKa12Cr28AcBznYY+vSPIBoOoFIac4E4kh5EVkb7tV 8JfAgXxkQcADW29WYY9Hp3+RZidYpamq7ir5bWyfyCjccN96r6GWJ2uWILXimZXe Js8pVA8ot7UUEpBWUS6YpcJqleLWSCe5sGGghsZ8ssodBgnYpz+WVpBhaitjvrMf SXtmb2M/hizcAH13WSaE9oaLPsBAwEeMkPQx7xIwufpIxTf8AuAZxz/QWr+INwY7 fgVUiE6ga+8Pbu/YeJtSAJn9grr+c56/lfopEy9pHvxCm7EC9w9vxyTQzP5I9wZW 60OVqJfrKpqgoC8ae0op0g56CVY5yAtWPErLAwhVLjbMzUVL2A0aHriTWv0RGDC5 r6ccVnV8PdAw8f8RyCzW+V3q0HBYVX+DyYqXP6tLcxnDBY8m8nJQOaVvS2TTwssL lwn82jMBRA+F4e4fVnt2HyDS2KxK7n+oOdcj3cP3S5nvKOrDFC8= =FZvc -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----