Google has reviewed IPP Driver Replacement Extensions v2.0 and has comments

Benjamin Gordon via ipp <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ipp
Message-ID <CADaYBq2NEzB4o2vU6FM9T9xFaNSa8Xft3yCNKm18bNW=iboxvg@mail.gmail.com>
Sorry about the slow review.  Just a few minor editorial comments:

Section 1:
line 381: depends -> depend for grammatical agreement with "client modules"

Section 5.1:
line 899: It seems like a phrase is missing to explain when the printer
must reject the operation.  Should it include something like "When the
operation is not allowed for a security reason" similar to PWG 5100.13-2012?

Section 6.1.4:
line 1075: implemneting -> implementing

Section 6.2.2.2:
line 1131: Some words seem to be missing before "expand the Impression".
lines 1134/1138: The two figures have the same caption.  Should they
mention "extend" and "scale" to help the reader see which method each
illustrates?

Section 12.1.1:
line 2517: extra "he" in "the he" at the end of the line

Thanks,
Benjamin

_______________________________________________
ipp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.