Google has reviewed IPP Driver Replacement Extensions v2.0 and has comments
Benjamin Gordon via ipp <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ipp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CADaYBq2NEzB4o2vU6FM9T9xFaNSa8Xft3yCNKm18bNW=iboxvg@mail.gmail.com> |
Sorry about the slow review. Just a few minor editorial comments: Section 1: line 381: depends -> depend for grammatical agreement with "client modules" Section 5.1: line 899: It seems like a phrase is missing to explain when the printer must reject the operation. Should it include something like "When the operation is not allowed for a security reason" similar to PWG 5100.13-2012? Section 6.1.4: line 1075: implemneting -> implementing Section 6.2.2.2: line 1131: Some words seem to be missing before "expand the Impression". lines 1134/1138: The two figures have the same caption. Should they mention "extend" and "scale" to help the reader see which method each illustrates? Section 12.1.1: line 2517: extra "he" in "the he" at the end of the line Thanks, Benjamin _______________________________________________ ipp mailing list [email protected] https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp