Re: Google has reviewed IPP Driver Replacement Extensions v2.0 and has comments

"Kennedy, Smith \(Wireless & IPP Standards\) via ipp" <[email protected]> Tue, 20 Dec 2022 13:54:07 +0000

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.ipp
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Thank you Benjamin for your contribution to achieving quorum and for the feedback on the draft!

Happy holidays,

Smith

/**
    Smith Kennedy
    Vice Chair, IEEE ISTO Printer Working Group
    HP Inc.
*/


> On Dec 19, 2022, at 5:13 PM, Benjamin Gordon <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> CAUTION: External Email
> Sorry about the slow review.  Just a few minor editorial comments:
> 
> Section 1:
> line 381: depends -> depend for grammatical agreement with "client modules"
> 
> Section 5.1:
> line 899: It seems like a phrase is missing to explain when the printer must reject the operation.  Should it include something like "When the operation is not allowed for a security reason" similar to PWG 5100.13-2012?
> 
> Section 6.1.4:
> line 1075: implemneting -> implementing
> 
> Section 6.2.2.2 <http://6.2.2.2>:
> line 1131: Some words seem to be missing before "expand the Impression".
> lines 1134/1138: The two figures have the same caption.  Should they mention "extend" and "scale" to help the reader see which method each illustrates?
> 
> Section 12.1.1:
> line 2517: extra "he" in "the he" at the end of the line
> 
> Thanks,
> Benjamin
>

_______________________________________________
ipp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)