Re: [EXTERNAL] Feedback request on "printer-icons" and "printer-more-info-manufacturer" in PWG IPP-Infra

Agree that the most important component is ensuring the resource is accessible with the same credentials or with no credentials.

Thanks,
Jimmy

________________________________
From: Michael Sweet
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2024 11:39 AM
To: Jimmy Wu
Cc: PWG IPP Workgroup
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] [IPP] Feedback request on "printer-icons" and "printer-more-info-manufacturer" in PWG IPP-Infra

Jimmy,

> On Apr 22, 2024, at 2:03 PM, Jimmy Wu <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Thanks Michael for the initial comment.
>
> The direction you suggested also makes sense to me.
> The additional minor question is around whether the these various URI values need to have the same domain as the Infrastructure printer's own URI, assuming all other rules are in place.

Adopting the W3C's notion of "Same Origin" might make sense, although I can also see sharing common resources (standard ICC color profiles, strings files, etc.) from a CDN.  But those should either be accessible with the same credentials or with no credentials (publicly accessible).

________________________
Michael Sweet

_______________________________________________
ipp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp