Re: What value do IPP Printers provide for "printer-name"?
Anton Thomasson via ipp <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ipp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABFDNXR08TpCDdoZ9sHYrGjfp=ZiA0bXZh4X9n1v2mOBY55RMw@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi I too expect something human-useful here. Looking through my user-supplied attribute dumps, i see most printers doing something decent; mostly model-based. Some interesting outliers: - Xerox WorkCentre 6515: "192.168.1.74" - Various Brother printers: "" (empty string) - Brother VC-500W: "print" (from /ipp/print presumably) - EPSON SC-P900: "ipp/print" Br, Anton Den ons 12 juni 2024 kl 12:38 skrev Arun Holla via ipp <[email protected]>: > Hi Smith, > > > > For the Fiery Digital Front End servers, here are the IPP attribute values > being populated: > > > > - printer-name à ‘hostname’ > - printer-make-and-model à Specific printer manufacturer and model > name, and is fixed. > - printer-dns-sd-name à Bonjour Service Name concatenated with the > last 3 octets of the Mac address (similar to Xerox). Default is the printer > manufacturer and model name concatenated with the 3 octets of Mac address. > This helps to keep it unique as it is used during the printer discovery. > This value changes when the Bonjour service name is changed by the user. > > > > Thanks, > > -Arun- > > *From:* ipp <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Rizzo, Christopher via > ipp > *Sent:* Wednesday, June 12, 2024 4:44 AM > *To:* Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & IPP Standards) <[email protected]> > *Cc:* Rizzo, Christopher <[email protected]>; PWG IPP WG > Reflector <[email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: [IPP] What value do IPP Printers provide for > "printer-name"? > > > > *[EXTERNAL] * > > Of course - I just thought of what happens when there is a name conflict > with another device on the network, and tested it. > > > > The conflict caused the registered name via MDNS to have "(2)" appended to > it, but neither printer-name nor printer-dns-sd-name were updated to match. > > > > So now I'm wondering if that is a bug. Is that a bug? I think that is as > I read PWG 5100.13 - printer-dns-sd-name at a minumum should have changed > to match the MDNS (updated) registered name. > > > > Chris > > > > *Christopher Rizzo* > > *Engineer II, Software Engineering* > > *Design & Development Engineering* > > > > [image: signature_965322133] <http://www.xerox.com/> > > > > Xerox Corporation > > Virtual Office Employee > > 26600 SW Parkway Ave > > Wilsonville, OR 97070 > > > > [image: signature_444176381] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/xerox/> [image: > signature_1244739495] <https://www.youtube.com/user/XeroxCorp> [image: > signature_4095302439] <https://twitter.com/Xerox> [image: > signature_510884951] <https://www.instagram.com/xerox/> [image: > signature_496444296] <https://www.facebook.com/XeroxCorp> > > > > > > *From: *Christopher Rizzo <[email protected]> > *Date: *Tuesday, June 11, 2024 at 4:03 PM > *To: *Kennedy Smith <[email protected]> > *Cc: *PWG Workgroup <[email protected]>, Michael Sweet <[email protected]> > *Subject: *Re: [IPP] What value do IPP Printers provide for > "printer-name"? > > > > Yes, both are updated together. > > > > And they are independent of the hostname > > > > Chris > > > > *Christopher Rizzo* > > *Engineer II, Software Engineering* > > *Design & Development Engineering* > > > > [image: signature_2133543743] <http://www.xerox.com/> > > > > Xerox Corporation > > Virtual Office Employee > > 26600 SW Parkway Ave > > Wilsonville, OR 97070 > > > > [image: signature_379100592] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/xerox/> [image: > signature_3069953614] <https://www.youtube.com/user/XeroxCorp> [image: > signature_2858899317] <https://twitter.com/Xerox> [image: > signature_3573846891] <https://www.instagram.com/xerox/> [image: > signature_2872972201] <https://www.facebook.com/XeroxCorp> > > > > > > *From: *Kennedy Smith <[email protected]> > *Date: *Tuesday, June 11, 2024 at 3:49 PM > *To: *Christopher Rizzo <[email protected]> > *Cc: *PWG Workgroup <[email protected]>, Michael Sweet <[email protected]> > *Subject: *Re: [IPP] What value do IPP Printers provide for > "printer-name"? > > > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not > click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know > the content is safe. > > Thanks Chris! HP printers do something similar for the default DNS-SD > Instance Name. If Xerox printers provide the same value for "printer-name" > as "printer-dns-sd-name", if one changes then so does the other? > > > > Smith > > > > On Jun 11, 2024, at 3:21 PM, Rizzo, Christopher < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > *CAUTION: External Email * > > The Xerox devices that I work on use the Bonjour advertisement name for > IPP printer-name. I cannot speak for all Xerox products. > > The factory default for this is "Xerox <model> (<last 3 bytes of eth mac > addr>)". > > Reason for the mac addr append is for customers that purchase more than > one device they can be identified while avoiding the need for initial > conflicts in name resolution. > > Chris > > Christopher Rizzo > Engineer II, Software Engineering > Design & Development Engineering > > <http://www.xerox.com/> > > Xerox Corporation > Virtual Office Employee > 26600 SW Parkway Ave > Wilsonville, OR 97070 > > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/xerox/> < > https://www.youtube.com/user/XeroxCorp> <https://twitter.com/Xerox> < > https://www.instagram.com/xerox/> <https://www.facebook.com/XeroxCorp> > > > > > > On 6/11/24, 12:46 PM, "ipp on behalf of Michael Sweet via ipp" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> on behalf of [email protected] <mailto:[email protected] > <[email protected]>>> wrote: > > > Smith, > > > > On Jun 11, 2024, at 3:22 PM, Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & IPP Standards) <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > ... > > So the attributes involved in a discussion were: > > > > printer-name (RFC 2911 / 8011 - required) > > printer-make-and-model (RFC 2911 / 8011 - recommended) > > printer-dns-sd-name (PWG 5100.13 - required) > > > > The wording of "printer-name" makes it sound like it should be a unique > name, not a model name... > > > A printer by any other name would smell as sweet? > > > From RFC 8011, "printer-name" is *not* a unique name, just a more friendly > one: > > > 5.4.4. printer-name (name(127)) > > > This REQUIRED Printer attribute contains the name of the Printer. It > is a name that is more End User friendly than a URI. An > Administrator determines a Printer's name and sets this attribute to > that name. This name can be the last part of the Printer's URI, or > it can be unrelated. In non-US-English locales, a name can contain > characters that are not allowed in a URI. > > > ________________________ > Michael Sweet > > > > _______________________________________________ > ipp mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp > _______________________________________________ ipp mailing list [email protected] https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp
image001.png
(image/png, 8.9 KB) - not displayed
image002.png
(image/png, 1.4 KB) - not displayed
image003.png
(image/png, 1.4 KB) - not displayed
image004.png
(image/png, 1.5 KB) - not displayed
image005.png
(image/png, 1.6 KB) - not displayed
image006.png
(image/png, 1.4 KB) - not displayed
image007.png
(image/png, 8.9 KB) - not displayed
image008.png
(image/png, 1.4 KB) - not displayed
image009.png
(image/png, 1.4 KB) - not displayed
image010.png
(image/png, 1.5 KB) - not displayed
image011.png
(image/png, 1.6 KB) - not displayed
image012.png
(image/png, 1.4 KB) - not displayed