Re: What value do IPP Printers provide for "printer-name"?

Anton Thomasson via ipp <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ipp
Message-ID <CABFDNXR08TpCDdoZ9sHYrGjfp=ZiA0bXZh4X9n1v2mOBY55RMw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi

I too expect something human-useful here.
Looking through my user-supplied attribute dumps, i see most printers doing
something decent; mostly model-based.

Some interesting outliers:

   - Xerox WorkCentre 6515: "192.168.1.74"
   - Various Brother printers: "" (empty string)
   - Brother VC-500W: "print" (from /ipp/print presumably)
   - EPSON SC-P900: "ipp/print"

Br,
Anton

Den ons 12 juni 2024 kl 12:38 skrev Arun Holla via ipp <[email protected]>:

> Hi Smith,
>
>
>
> For the Fiery Digital Front End servers, here are the IPP attribute values
> being populated:
>
>
>
>    - printer-name à ‘hostname’
>    - printer-make-and-model à Specific printer manufacturer and model
>    name, and is fixed.
>    - printer-dns-sd-name à Bonjour Service Name concatenated with the
>    last 3 octets of the Mac address (similar to Xerox). Default is the printer
>    manufacturer and model name concatenated with the 3 octets of Mac address.
>    This helps to keep it unique as it is used during the printer discovery.
>    This value changes when the Bonjour service name is changed by the user.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Arun-
>
> *From:* ipp <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Rizzo, Christopher via
> ipp
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 12, 2024 4:44 AM
> *To:* Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & IPP Standards) <[email protected]>
> *Cc:* Rizzo, Christopher <[email protected]>; PWG IPP WG
> Reflector <[email protected]>
> *Subject:* Re: [IPP] What value do IPP Printers provide for
> "printer-name"?
>
>
>
> *[EXTERNAL] *
>
> Of course - I just thought of what happens when there is a name conflict
> with another device on the network, and tested it.
>
>
>
> The conflict caused the registered name via MDNS to have "(2)" appended to
> it, but neither printer-name nor printer-dns-sd-name were updated to match.
>
>
>
> So now I'm wondering if that is a bug. Is that a bug?  I think that is as
> I read PWG 5100.13 - printer-dns-sd-name at a minumum should have changed
> to match the MDNS (updated) registered name.
>
>
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> *Christopher Rizzo*
>
> *Engineer II, Software Engineering*
>
> *Design & Development Engineering*
>
>
>
> [image: signature_965322133] <http://www.xerox.com/>
>
>
>
> Xerox Corporation
>
> Virtual Office Employee
>
> 26600 SW Parkway Ave
>
> Wilsonville, OR 97070
>
>
>
> [image: signature_444176381] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/xerox/>   [image:
> signature_1244739495] <https://www.youtube.com/user/XeroxCorp>   [image:
> signature_4095302439] <https://twitter.com/Xerox>   [image:
> signature_510884951] <https://www.instagram.com/xerox/>   [image:
> signature_496444296] <https://www.facebook.com/XeroxCorp>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Christopher Rizzo <[email protected]>
> *Date: *Tuesday, June 11, 2024 at 4:03 PM
> *To: *Kennedy Smith <[email protected]>
> *Cc: *PWG Workgroup <[email protected]>, Michael Sweet <[email protected]>
> *Subject: *Re: [IPP] What value do IPP Printers provide for
> "printer-name"?
>
>
>
> Yes, both are updated together.
>
>
>
> And they are independent of the hostname
>
>
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> *Christopher Rizzo*
>
> *Engineer II, Software Engineering*
>
> *Design & Development Engineering*
>
>
>
> [image: signature_2133543743] <http://www.xerox.com/>
>
>
>
> Xerox Corporation
>
> Virtual Office Employee
>
> 26600 SW Parkway Ave
>
> Wilsonville, OR 97070
>
>
>
> [image: signature_379100592] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/xerox/>   [image:
> signature_3069953614] <https://www.youtube.com/user/XeroxCorp>   [image:
> signature_2858899317] <https://twitter.com/Xerox>   [image:
> signature_3573846891] <https://www.instagram.com/xerox/>   [image:
> signature_2872972201] <https://www.facebook.com/XeroxCorp>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Kennedy Smith <[email protected]>
> *Date: *Tuesday, June 11, 2024 at 3:49 PM
> *To: *Christopher Rizzo <[email protected]>
> *Cc: *PWG Workgroup <[email protected]>, Michael Sweet <[email protected]>
> *Subject: *Re: [IPP] What value do IPP Printers provide for
> "printer-name"?
>
>
>
> CAUTION:   This email originated from outside the organization. Do not
> click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know
> the content is safe.
>
> Thanks Chris! HP printers do something similar for the default DNS-SD
> Instance Name. If Xerox printers provide the same value for "printer-name"
> as "printer-dns-sd-name", if one changes then so does the other?
>
>
>
> Smith
>
>
>
> On Jun 11, 2024, at 3:21 PM, Rizzo, Christopher <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> *CAUTION: External Email *
>
> The Xerox devices that I work on use the Bonjour advertisement name for
> IPP printer-name. I cannot speak for all Xerox products.
>
> The factory default for this is "Xerox <model> (<last 3 bytes of eth mac
> addr>)".
>
> Reason for the mac addr append is for customers that purchase more than
> one device they can be identified while avoiding the need for initial
> conflicts in name resolution.
>
> Chris
>
> Christopher Rizzo
> Engineer II, Software Engineering
> Design & Development Engineering
>
> <http://www.xerox.com/>
>
> Xerox Corporation
> Virtual Office Employee
> 26600 SW Parkway Ave
> Wilsonville, OR 97070
>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/xerox/> <
> https://www.youtube.com/user/XeroxCorp> <https://twitter.com/Xerox> <
> https://www.instagram.com/xerox/> <https://www.facebook.com/XeroxCorp>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 6/11/24, 12:46 PM, "ipp on behalf of Michael Sweet via ipp" <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]> on behalf of [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]
> <[email protected]>>> wrote:
>
>
> Smith,
>
>
> > On Jun 11, 2024, at 3:22 PM, Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & IPP Standards) <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> > ...
> > So the attributes involved in a discussion were:
> >
> > printer-name (RFC 2911 / 8011 - required)
> > printer-make-and-model (RFC 2911 / 8011 - recommended)
> > printer-dns-sd-name (PWG 5100.13 - required)
> >
> > The wording of "printer-name" makes it sound like it should be a unique
> name, not a model name...
>
>
> A printer by any other name would smell as sweet?
>
>
> From RFC 8011, "printer-name" is *not* a unique name, just a more friendly
> one:
>
>
> 5.4.4. printer-name (name(127))
>
>
> This REQUIRED Printer attribute contains the name of the Printer. It
> is a name that is more End User friendly than a URI. An
> Administrator determines a Printer's name and sets this attribute to
> that name. This name can be the last part of the Printer's URI, or
> it can be unrelated. In non-US-English locales, a name can contain
> characters that are not allowed in a URI.
>
>
> ________________________
> Michael Sweet
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp
>

_______________________________________________
ipp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp
image001.png (image/png, 8.9 KB) - not displayed
image002.png (image/png, 1.4 KB) - not displayed
image003.png (image/png, 1.4 KB) - not displayed
image004.png (image/png, 1.5 KB) - not displayed
image005.png (image/png, 1.6 KB) - not displayed
image006.png (image/png, 1.4 KB) - not displayed
image007.png (image/png, 8.9 KB) - not displayed
image008.png (image/png, 1.4 KB) - not displayed
image009.png (image/png, 1.4 KB) - not displayed
image010.png (image/png, 1.5 KB) - not displayed
image011.png (image/png, 1.6 KB) - not displayed
image012.png (image/png, 1.4 KB) - not displayed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.