Re: IPP Offset Stacking
Michael Sweet via ipp <[email protected]> Thu, 12 Dec 2024 13:44:39 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ipp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Andy, > On Dec 12, 2024, at 1:06 PM, Andy Singer via ipp <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Does anyone know of any printers that support IPP offset stacking? jog-offset was deprecated in favor of stacker-NN, would this mean I could create a bunch of jobs for stacker-01, then create more for stacker-02, and there would be two distinct piles at the end? I've checked a couple that support offset stacking via drivers, unfortunately when I do a Get-Attributes there's nothing in the response that indicates stacker support. You'd just look at the "output-bin-supported" attribute for any of the "stacker-N" or "my-stacker" values. > I also noticed that the pwg-raster format has support for specifying a jog, does anyone know if any printers would respect this value? I don't believe so, no. Certainly no Client I am aware of will set this value. > Lastly, does multiple-document-handling have any interaction with offset stacking? This piece might not be relevant as none of the printers I've tested so far have support for multiple documents in a single job. Jobs are stacked by Set, and what constitutes a Set is determined by the multiple-document-handling attribute. As most printers only support single-document jobs, the Set is usually one copy of the document. ________________________ Michael Sweet _______________________________________________ ipp mailing list [email protected] https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp