Re: [EXTERNAL] IPP WG Last Call: IPP Envelope Media Extensions v1.0 (ENVELOPE) [Ends May 9, 2025]
Michael Sweet via ipp <[email protected]> Tue, 20 May 2025 20:45:47 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ipp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Michael/Charles, We will talk about this on Thursday. I did my diagrams assuming that the content is printed on the bottom side, i.e., the flap is on top in the images, so you'd lift the leading edge to the top (flip vertically) to view the printed envelope. If the printer prints on the front side of the envelope then the 2nd and 4th columns would be swapped in the figure. The key is to make sure the orientation of the printed content is aligned with the flap location. > On May 16, 2025, at 3:33 PM, Charles Armstrong <[email protected]> wrote: > > @Michael Ziller, I agree. > Attached is the client job scenario, same diagram with output illustration and corrected feed-orientation is in red. > Is my understanding right? > Thanks > Charles > -----Original Message----- > From: ipp <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Michael Ziller via ipp > Sent: Friday, May 16, 2025 10:03 AM > To: ISTO-PWG Internet Printing Protocol workgroup discussion forum <[email protected]> > Cc: Michael Ziller <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [IPP] [EXTERNAL] IPP WG Last Call: IPP Envelope Media Extensions v1.0 (ENVELOPE) [Ends May 9, 2025] > > Email was not sent from a Canon Network! > > Sorry for noticing this late, but can we review Figure 1 - Flap Locations? > > It's easier I believe to explain if we rotated all these images with the leading edge at the top of the page. And then: > - The first image has feed-orientation=portrait, feed-direction=short-edge-edge-first, and here the flap is along the leading edge > - But the last image has feed-orientation=reverse-landscape, feed-direction=long-edge-first > > Since the envelope flap is also along the leading edge here, shouldn't the feed-orientation be landscape instead of reverse-landscape? > > - For the second image, since the flap location is rotated 3 counterclockwise 90 degree rotations from the leading edge, shouldn't feed-orientation be reverse-landscape rather than landscape? > > Thanks, > Michael Ziller > > -----Original Message----- > From: ipp <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Michael Sweet via ipp > Sent: Friday, April 25, 2025 1:30 PM > To: PWG IPP Workgroup <[email protected]> > Cc: Michael Sweet <[email protected]> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] [IPP] IPP WG Last Call: IPP Envelope Media Extensions v1.0 (ENVELOPE) [Ends May 9, 2025] > > All, > > This message starts the IPP workgroup last call of the IPP Envelope Media Extensions v1.0 (ENVELOPE) registration at: > > https://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippenvelope10-20250425.pdf > > This registration extends the definition of envelope media sizes to include flap location and orientation. > > Please "reply all" to this message with any feedback or comments about the content of this registration before 10pm PT on May 9, 2025. > > We plan on publishing this registration and the new attributes to the IANA IPP registry after a successful conclusion of this last call. > > ________________________ > Michael Sweet > > _______________________________________________ > ipp mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp > _______________________________________________ > ipp mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp > <Envelope Job Scenario.png> ________________________ Michael Sweet _______________________________________________ ipp mailing list [email protected] https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp