Raster compression

--===============0935992959805638329==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000069d225064bb1e1bb"

--00000000000069d225064bb1e1bb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Hello Everyone,

I am looking for guidance on the best approach for handling larger rasters.
Specifically, what is the current recommended method for raster compression?

There is a "compression-supported" IPP attribute that allows the client to
apply compression to the IPP payload. However, for many printers this
attribute contains only "none".

I cannot find any reference to HTTP-level compression. Is it mentioned in
any IPP document?

Or is there any other way to deal with large rasters?

I would appreciate any information.

Best regards,
Piotr

--00000000000069d225064bb1e1bb
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><br><div>Hello Everyone,</div><div><br></div><div>I am loo=
king for guidance on the best approach for handling larger rasters. Specifi=
cally, what is the current recommended method for raster compression?</div>=
<div><br></div><div>There is a &quot;compression-supported&quot; IPP attrib=
ute that allows the client to apply compression to the IPP payload. However=
, for many=C2=A0printers this attribute contains only &quot;none&quot;.</di=
v><div><br></div><div>I cannot find any reference to HTTP-level compression=
. Is it mentioned in any IPP document?=C2=A0</div><div><br></div><div>Or is=
 there any other way to deal with large rasters?</div><div><br></div><div>I=
 would appreciate any information.</div><div><br></div><div>Best regards,</=
div><div>Piotr</div></div>

--00000000000069d225064bb1e1bb--

--===============0935992959805638329==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
ipp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp

--===============0935992959805638329==--