RE: ips WG *will* meet in Dallas

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ips
Message-ID <F222151D3323874393F83102D614E055013E92DA@CORPUSMX20A.corp.emc.com>
Not yet, I did ask for a long timeslot, so it could be
almost any day.  --David

----------------------------------------------------
David L. Black, Senior Technologist
EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
+1 (508) 293-7953             FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786
[email protected]        Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
----------------------------------------------------

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Wysochanski [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 12:34 PM
> To: Black, David
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Ips] ips WG *will* meet in Dallas
> 
> Does IPS have a day and/or timeslot yet?
> (didn't see it on the current IETF draft agenda)
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> [email protected] wrote:
> > Oops, forgot an agenda item for Dallas:
> >         - iSNS MIB (discussion of newly reduced 
> functionality scope).
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > --David
> > ----------------------------------------------------
> > David L. Black, Senior Technologist
> > EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
> > +1 (508) 293-7953             FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786
> > [email protected]        Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
> > ----------------------------------------------------
> > 
> >  > -----Original Message-----
> >  > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> >  > Behalf Of Black, David
> >  > Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 8:26 PM
> >  > To: [email protected]
> >  > Subject: [Ips] ips WG *will* meet in Dallas
> >  >
> >  > The IP Storage WG will meet in Dallas at the IETF meetings
> >  > during the week of March 19th.  The topics I know about
> >  > for the agenda are:
> >  >       - iSCSI Implementers Guide (anything and everything)
> >  >       - David Wysochanski's forthcoming iSCSI X# key draft
> >  >
> >  > Any remaining time will be used to start a very preliminary
> >  > discussion of what to do about the IETF Security Area's request
> >  > that plans be made to eliminate all uses of MD5 from IETF
> >  > protocols in the not-too-distant future.  Anyone else who
> >  > wants agenda time should to send me email with a topic,
> >  > Internet-Draft name and time estimate.
> >  >
> >  > NOTE: Before anyone gets excited, there is no reason to
> >  > believe that iSCSI has any security issues courtesy of
> >  > its use of MD5 (e.g., CHAP is ok as there is no indication
> >  > that anyone is close to inverting MD5), with the possible
> >  > exception of MD5 in certificate signatures for IPsec (don't
> >  > do that - at least use SHA-1), which is an issue for the
> >  > pkix WG to address.  This is about good engineering practice
> >  > (MD5 has known flaws, it will only get worse, not better,
> >  > so it's time to think about migrating to sounder technology).
> >  >
> >  > Thanks,
> >  > --David (ips WG chair)
> >  > ----------------------------------------------------
> >  > David L. Black, Senior Technologist
> >  > EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
> >  > +1 (508) 293-7953             FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786
> >  > [email protected]        Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
> >  > ----------------------------------------------------
> >  >
> >  > _______________________________________________
> >  > Ips mailing list
> >  > [email protected]
> >  > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips
> >  >
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ips mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips
> > 
> 

_______________________________________________
Ips mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.