Re: Target Behavior Clarifications (with corrections)
Paul Koning <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ips |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> "Eddy" == Eddy Quicksall <[email protected]> writes: Eddy> In most cases I feel that if the initiator is going to violate Eddy> the spec then the connection should just be dropped ... I agree. If the other side doesn't do what the spec says, why keep talking? There's no reason to believe that will help matters. The other argument is that error paths for obscure errors should be simple, otherwise they are likely to be buggy. Introducing the risk of bugs into an iSCSI implementation for the sake of supporting broken partners it not a good tradeoff. paul _______________________________________________ Ips mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips