Re: Targets that don't want to support discovery

William Studenmund <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ips
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Apr 27, 2006, at 11:50 AM, Eddy Quicksall wrote:

> Appendix D says:
>    A system that contains targets MUST support discovery sessions on
>    each of its iSCSI IP address-port pairs, and MUST support the
>    SendTargets command on the discovery session
>
> Suppose I have targets A, B and C. I want target A to be the only  
> target that can support discovery. Login to targets B and C will be  
> redirected by A.
>
> This is fine except for the fact that once the redirection occurs  
> the initiator has the address of B and C and could open a discovery  
> session to B or C.
>
> I'm thinking that I could have B and C redirect to A for any  
> discovery session hence A would become the only target to support  
> discovery (but that would "break the law").
>
> I'm wondering how the community thinks this should be handled.

I have a feeling that that'd be breaking the rules.

Why do you want to do this?

Another option is that while ports B and C should support discovery  
sessions, they don't have to do it very efficiently. It's fine if  
they use some sort of proxy to internally route the commands to A for  
processing. So only A is very smart, but discovery works everywhere.

Take care,

Bill

_______________________________________________
Ips mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips
PGP.sig (application/pgp-signature, 186 B) - not displayed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.