RFC4171 error? [ was MIB Doctor review for: draft-ietf-ips-isns-m ib-09.txt]

"Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ips
Message-ID <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B1550A004918@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>
Dan asked for a volunteer for MIB doctor review, and
I offered to do so. It is a pretty big MIB module,
and so I need some mroe time than I had originally 
allocated. If the WG wants me to, I can send what
I have now, or I can wait till I have completed my
review (not sure I will be able to finish this week).

In order to do proper review I am also reading RFC4171.
I fin there (in my view) a discrepancy between the figure
in sect 5 and the flag bit positions in sect 5.1.4

>From the figure it seems tto me that the flags field is
only 16 bits. Yet section 5.1.4 talks about bit positions 
16-31 ?? Is this on purpose? Am I missing something?

Bert

_______________________________________________
Ips mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.