RE: RFC4171 error? [ was MIB Doctor review for:draft-ietf- ips-isns-m ib-09.txt]

"Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ips
Message-ID <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B1550A004AF8@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>
Inline

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Gibbons [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 18:00
> To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert); David Black (E-mail)
> Cc: [email protected]; Scott Kipp; [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [Ips] RFC4171 error? [ was MIB Doctor review
> for:draft-ietf-ips-isns-m ib-09.txt]
> 
> 
> Bert,
> 
> As a co-author of the iSNS MIB draft, I would prefer you send the
> feedback that you have now.  That would allow us to get started on the
> response progress.
> 
OK, will package and send asap.

> Regarding RFC 4171, bits 16 to 31 would comprise 16 bits.  Or am I
> missing something in the feedback?
> 
> 1   2         3
> 6789012345678901
> 

Well, the mismatch is that a field of 16 bits (in my view) has bits 0-15
and not 16-31. 

Bert
> Regards, Kevin
> 
> (gate01)

_______________________________________________
Ips mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.