Re: TargetAlias in SendTarget response

Julian Satran <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ips
Message-ID <OF80285244.D3C71DF3-ON85257180.0052B30A-85257180.0052F8E4@il.ibm.com>
So we are talking milliseconds instead of microseconds for very long 
lasting (hours, days) sessions.
I am not sure I would support a public key.

Julo



David Weibel <[email protected]> 
Sent by: [email protected]
01/06/06 10:23

To
Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL
cc
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject
Re: [Ips] TargetAlias in SendTarget response






Julian Satran wrote:

> The spec authors did not intend to encourage the use of discovery 
> sessions - except for bootstraping a management infrastructure.
> As for the specific TargetAlias you can get it in two steps - first a 
> regular discovery then a "targeted discovery" (icluding the target 
name).
> Software will take that path to support targets that don't understand 
> the new key so why introduce the new key?

It is understood this is already supported in a multi step way within the
current iSCSI specification.

If a target returns an initiator a list of 100 targets via a 
SendTargets=All
and the initiator turns around and logs in and out of each target to just
get the TargetAlias this leads to poor performance.  The suggested change
cuts this process to one step when possible and directly improves 
management
performance.

_______________________________________________
Ips mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.