Re: TargetAlias in SendTarget response
"Mallikarjun C." <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ips |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I have some appreciation for the long discovery times in large SANs. However, volume-level discovery consumes the bulk of today's discovery time rather than target device-level discovery. So while I see the proposed optimization for device-level discovery, I am not sure it is compelling enough for me. Mallikarjun --- Julian Satran <[email protected]> wrote: > So we are talking milliseconds instead of > microseconds for very long > lasting (hours, days) sessions. > I am not sure I would support a public key. > > Julo > > > > David Weibel <[email protected]> > Sent by: [email protected] > 01/06/06 10:23 > > To > Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL > cc > [email protected], [email protected], > [email protected] > Subject > Re: [Ips] TargetAlias in SendTarget response > > > > > > > Julian Satran wrote: > > > The spec authors did not intend to encourage the > use of discovery > > sessions - except for bootstraping a management > infrastructure. > > As for the specific TargetAlias you can get it in > two steps - first a > > regular discovery then a "targeted discovery" > (icluding the target > name). > > Software will take that path to support targets > that don't understand > > the new key so why introduce the new key? > > It is understood this is already supported in a > multi step way within the > current iSCSI specification. > > If a target returns an initiator a list of 100 > targets via a > SendTargets=All > and the initiator turns around and logs in and out > of each target to just > get the TargetAlias this leads to poor performance. > The suggested change > cuts this process to one step when possible and > directly improves > management > performance. > > > _______________________________________________ > Ips mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Ips mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips