RE: DRAFT Montreal minutes - X#NodeArchitecture comments

Hi Paul,

In [RFC3720] it is ALWAYS an error when the value of a declared key is
"NotUnderstood". Hence this document needs to state the (slightly)
altered processing of this key.

Cheers
Ken

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Koning [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Monday, 7 August 2006 23:51
> To: Sandars, Ken
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [Ips] DRAFT Montreal minutes - 
> X#NodeArchitecture comments
> 
> >>>>> "Ken" == Ken Sandars <Sandars> writes:
> 
>  Ken> Hi David, Yes, you've got the angle I'm coming from. 
> It's  Ken> important to express the idea that while it is a 
> declared key,  Ken> the rules for declared keys are being 
> slightly bent such that it  Ken> is not a protocol error to 
> receive a "NotUnderstood" in the  Ken> context of the other 
> node processing it as an offered key.
> 
> So why is that new?  It should be the common rule for all 
> declared keys.
> 
> 	paul
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ips mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips
> 

_______________________________________________
Ips mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips