Re: Re-sending a command

"Mallikarjun C." <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ips
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Sorry, I am catching up late on this thread.

LU reset actually does not by itself plug the holes
since it is not a target-scoped request like warm &
cold resets.  

OTOH, as Ken illustrated in his example, whenever a
TMF Response with an ExpCmdSN larger than the
timed-out command is sent by the target, the timed-out
command is implicitly acknowledged and the left edge
of the CmdSN window has advanced beyond that of
timed-out command.  RFC 3720 is sufficiently explicit
on that point.

Mallikarjun



--- Julian Satran <[email protected]> wrote:

> Eddy,
> 
> The LU reset "plugs the holes" in command sequence
> and the old CmdSN 
> should not be used (it is definitely an initiator
> bug). If you have seen 
> it Mallikarjun may want to mention that dropping the
> command is the 
> expected behavior of the target after all the task
> management commands 
> that "plug the holes" in the implementation guide.
> 
> Julo
> 
> 
> 
> "Eddy Quicksall"
> <[email protected]> 
> 10/08/06 01:34
> 
> To
> <[email protected]>
> cc
> Amit Kumar <[email protected]>
> Subject
> [Ips] Re-sending a command
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> It was brought to my attention that one initiator
> being tested will 
> re-issue a "timed out" command using the same CmdSN
> after it has issued a 
> LU Reset. When this happens the command is dropped.
> Note that this is on a 
> single connection session.
>  
> I'm wondering if this could be an initiator bug or
> if there is a case 
> where it is actually valid (in the report I have I
> don't know if the 
> initiator also reissued the command with a valid
> CmdSN or not).
>  
> Does anyone know?
>  
> Eddy_______________________________________________
> Ips mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips
> 
> > _______________________________________________
> Ips mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

_______________________________________________
Ips mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.