Re: Re-sending a command
"Mallikarjun C." <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ips |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Sorry, I am catching up late on this thread. LU reset actually does not by itself plug the holes since it is not a target-scoped request like warm & cold resets. OTOH, as Ken illustrated in his example, whenever a TMF Response with an ExpCmdSN larger than the timed-out command is sent by the target, the timed-out command is implicitly acknowledged and the left edge of the CmdSN window has advanced beyond that of timed-out command. RFC 3720 is sufficiently explicit on that point. Mallikarjun --- Julian Satran <[email protected]> wrote: > Eddy, > > The LU reset "plugs the holes" in command sequence > and the old CmdSN > should not be used (it is definitely an initiator > bug). If you have seen > it Mallikarjun may want to mention that dropping the > command is the > expected behavior of the target after all the task > management commands > that "plug the holes" in the implementation guide. > > Julo > > > > "Eddy Quicksall" > <[email protected]> > 10/08/06 01:34 > > To > <[email protected]> > cc > Amit Kumar <[email protected]> > Subject > [Ips] Re-sending a command > > > > > > > It was brought to my attention that one initiator > being tested will > re-issue a "timed out" command using the same CmdSN > after it has issued a > LU Reset. When this happens the command is dropped. > Note that this is on a > single connection session. > > I'm wondering if this could be an initiator bug or > if there is a case > where it is actually valid (in the report I have I > don't know if the > initiator also reissued the command with a valid > CmdSN or not). > > Does anyone know? > > Eddy_______________________________________________ > Ips mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips > > > _______________________________________________ > Ips mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Ips mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips