Re: WG Last Call review: draft-ietf-ips-iscsi-nodearch-key-01.txt

Dave Wyso <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ips
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Thanks.

The only change I think might not be necessary is the one in Section 4.
There was an error in the -00 version of the draft, but I think the -01
version is ok.


> 
> Section 4:
> 
>    The choice of which countermeasure is most appropriate depends on the
>    environment.  However, the first countermeasure may be acceptable in
>    many environments, since it provides a compromise between sending too
>    much information and the other more complete countermeasures of not
>    sending the key at all or using IPsec.
> 
> I think this should say 'However, the latter countermeasure'.  Recheck
> this text with respect to the immediately preceding paragraph in the
> draft.
> 


_______________________________________________
Ips mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.