RE: Portal group discovery
"Dan Bar Dov" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ips |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Ken, first of all, thanks, it helps. Let me se if I understand you correctly: portals of the same portal group (sharing same tag) can be used for multiple connections in session. Portals of different portal groups can be used for multiple sessions - and used by the initiator anyway it likes, e.g. in your example below, open two sessions, use one actively, and if it fails, use the other one. It does make sense, thanks, Dan ________________________________ From: Sandars, Ken [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2006 6:10 PM To: Dan Bar Dov; William Studenmund Cc: [email protected]; John Hufferd; Julian Satran Subject: RE: [Ips] Portal group discovery Example: Router 1 SendTargets response: TargetName=iqn.2006-09.com.muppet:thisismytargetpleasedonthurtme TargetAddress=192.168.11.2:3260,1 Router 2 SendTargets response: TargetName=iqn.2006-09.com.muppet:thisismytargetpleasedonthurtme TargetAddress=192.168.12.2:3260,2 The initiator puts 2 and 2 together (ok, 1 and 2, but you see what I mean), and comes up with: TargetName=iqn.2006-09.com.muppet:thisismytargetpleasedonthurtme TargetAddress=192.168.11.2:3260,1 TargetAddress=192.168.12.2:3260,2 So it knows three things: (1) The name of the target (2) That it can be reached via two portals (3) Connections on those portals cannot be spanned into the one session It can choose to login via either or both portals whenever it likes. There is no need for the routers to do any IP failover. Does that help? Ken ________________________________ From: Dan Bar Dov [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, 4 October 2006 01:43 To: William Studenmund Cc: Sandars, Ken; [email protected]; John Hufferd; Julian Satran Subject: RE: [Ips] Portal group discovery ________________________________ From: William Studenmund [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2006 5:28 PM To: Dan Bar Dov Cc: Sandars, Ken; [email protected]; John Hufferd; Julian Satran Subject: Re: [Ips] Portal group discovery On Oct 3, 2006, at 4:04 AM, Dan Bar Dov wrote: It is true that you cannot run two active connections in the same session when going through two routers. However, is it not possible to have a single active connection, and fail-over to a new (or a standby) connection ? The problem is that putting both routers in the same Target Portal Group (TPG) means exactly that the initiator CAN have two active connections, in the same session, through the two portals. So why do you want them in the same portal group? Why not just give each router a different TPG and be done with it? If each target is in a different TPG, how do I achieve fail-over between the routers? (other than maintaining some heart-beat between them, and moving the router IP address over). Take care, Bill _______________________________________________ Ips mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips