Re: IMPORTANT: WG Last Call on NodeArchitecture Key changes
Lars Eggert <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ips |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Oct 16, 2006, at 21:36, William Studenmund wrote: > My thought when we did this was that if a key was going to be a > proposed standard, we would not use the [XYZ]# space for it. > > So rather than changing the text, why not just make the key > "NodeArchitecture"? :-) My understanding is that existing > implementations will (should?) react the same way to such a key as > they would to X#NodeArchitecture (NotUnderstood), so we don't have > an interoperation issue. > > If the group wants to stick with X#, I am not opposed to changing > the text. I *would* like to see this document go to PS. If the WG comes to consensus on either David's or your proposal, that'd be fine with me. Lars -- Lars Eggert NEC Network Laboratories _______________________________________________ Ips mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips
smime.p7s
(application/pkcs7-signature, 3.6 KB) - not displayed