Re: IMPORTANT: WG Last Call on NodeArchitecture Key changes

Lars Eggert <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ips
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Oct 16, 2006, at 21:36, William Studenmund wrote:
> My thought when we did this was that if a key was going to be a  
> proposed standard, we would not use the [XYZ]# space for it.
>
> So rather than changing the text, why not just make the key  
> "NodeArchitecture"? :-) My understanding is that existing  
> implementations will (should?) react the same way to such a key as  
> they would to X#NodeArchitecture (NotUnderstood), so we don't have  
> an interoperation issue.
>
> If the group wants to stick with X#, I am not opposed to changing  
> the text.

I *would* like to see this document go to PS. If the WG comes to  
consensus on either David's or your proposal, that'd be fine with me.

Lars
-- 
Lars Eggert                                     NEC Network Laboratories

_______________________________________________
Ips mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips
smime.p7s (application/pkcs7-signature, 3.6 KB) - not displayed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.