Re: iSCSI Implementer's Guide - WG Last Call status
Paul Koning <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ips |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> "Mallikarjun" == Mallikarjun C <[email protected]> writes: Mallikarjun> Paul, Agree with everything you wrote. Mallikarjun> RFC 3720 does not require sane reactions to non-sane Mallikarjun> inputs. This draft should not say anything that Mallikarjun> suggests target/initiator may draw sane interpretations Mallikarjun> to non-sane inputs either. Great summary. Mallikarjun> Sounds like an agreement to not add any new text to me. Well, Eddy raised the issue a while back that some people writing conformance tests were interpreting "initiator must do X" as "target must check that initiator does X". That's clearly an incorrect conclusion. But given that people make this mistake, I wonder if a note in the guide saying "unless RFC 3720 specifically requires it, an implementation is not required to do protocol conformance checking on incoming message", or something like that, would be helpful. paul _______________________________________________ Ips mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips