Re: ips WG Last Call: iSCSI Implementer's Guide

On 2007-2-12, at 11:45, ext Mallikarjun C. wrote:
> You are right about the reference to 3721.  Sorry about that.  The  
> Introduction should have said:
> "The text in this document, however, updates
>     and supersedes the text in [RFC3720] whenever
>     there is such a question."
>
> Consequently, the normative reference in section 12.1 to [RFC3721]  
> should move down to the informative references in section 12.2.

OK

> On the "Updates" boilerplate..... I was not aware of such a  
> section.  I ran the draft through the i-d nit tool and it didn't  
> complain, so I assumed it should be alright.

The idnits tool can't check this (yet). See http://www.ietf.org/ID- 
Checklist.html Section 3.

Also note that the IESG likes to see "Intended status:" fields in IDs  
these days, because it lets idnits check for DOWNREFs. I'd consider  
adding one.

> On the best way to address these tweaks - wait for the IESG review  
> and then consider the RFC Editor publication process to address  
> them?  Or would you suggest another revision now?

Up to the chair and editor to decide. If it's all the same to you, I  
have a slight preference for a quick respin.

Lars

_______________________________________________
Ips mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips