RE: FW: Recent comments about FCoE and iSCSI

"John Hufferd" <[email protected]> Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:51:50 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ips
Message-ID <39BA3BC178B4394DB184389E88A97F8C022C5CC4@hq-exch-1.corp.brocade.com>
Ken,

The term FCoE has as its primary component FC.  Consider the possibility
that the DCE Link from the Host connects to a switch/device that is able
to deal with the FC part of the FCoE.

 

.

.

.

John L Hufferd

Sr. Executive Director of Technology

[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 

Office Phone: (408) 333-5244; eFAX: (408) 904-4688

Alt Office Phone: (408) 997-6136; Cell: (408) 627-9606

 

________________________________

From: Sandars, Ken [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 6:41 PM
To: John Hufferd; Eddy Quicksall; Julian Satran
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: RE: FW: [Ips] Recent comments about FCoE and iSCSI

 

Hey John,

 

[Hufferd] Many servers are asking for an evolutionary way to combine
their Networking connections from the Server.  The customers I have
dealt with do NOT want to rip out FC, they want to provide a single Link
for transport of all networking needs, including storage, exiting their
servers.


I'm not sure what you are saying here. Are you saying servers should
have a single type of physical network connection, presumably ethernet?
How does that align with not wanting to rip out FC?

 

Thanks

Ken

_______________________________________________
Ips mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips
image001.gif (image/gif, 2.9 KB) - not displayed