RE: FW: Recent comments about FCoE and iSCSI
[email protected] Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:48:33 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ips |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <75852864BAD9684FBF5DCF4289DE4076078FFA97@CORPUSMX30B.corp.emc.com> |
How would an FCoE-based initiator communicate with iSCSI-based storage? In other words, can the same host adapter be used for FCoE connections and iSCSI sessions, and if so, would the performance be similar? thanks, dj ________________________________ From: John Hufferd [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 12:52 AM To: Sandars, Ken; Eddy Quicksall; Julian Satran Cc: [email protected] Subject: RE: FW: [Ips] Recent comments about FCoE and iSCSI Ken, The term FCoE has as its primary component FC. Consider the possibility that the DCE Link from the Host connects to a switch/device that is able to deal with the FC part of the FCoE. . . . John L Hufferd Sr. Executive Director of Technology [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Office Phone: (408) 333-5244; eFAX: (408) 904-4688 Alt Office Phone: (408) 997-6136; Cell: (408) 627-9606 ________________________________ From: Sandars, Ken [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 6:41 PM To: John Hufferd; Eddy Quicksall; Julian Satran Cc: [email protected] Subject: RE: FW: [Ips] Recent comments about FCoE and iSCSI Hey John, [Hufferd] Many servers are asking for an evolutionary way to combine their Networking connections from the Server. The customers I have dealt with do NOT want to rip out FC, they want to provide a single Link for transport of all networking needs, including storage, exiting their servers. I'm not sure what you are saying here. Are you saying servers should have a single type of physical network connection, presumably ethernet? How does that align with not wanting to rip out FC? Thanks Ken _______________________________________________ Ips mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips