RE: StatSN question
"Ken Craig" <[email protected]> Fri, 18 May 2007 09:46:46 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ips |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Eddy, Thanks for the response. I've got an Initiator that is updating ExpStatSn before receiving all of the data. I consider that Initiator to be broken but since the RFC doesn't specifically state what you said I've got no choice but to find a way to deal with it. Ken Craig -----Original Message----- From: Eddy Quicksall [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 10:03 PM To: Ken Craig; [email protected] Subject: Re: [Ips] StatSN question It would mean the header and data has been received. The reason is because the target can use ExpStatSN to free the resources used to send the Data-in. At ERL 0 it is faster to just use the TCP ACK; for ERL > 0 I think there was argument given once that the TCP ACK may not really indicate that the data was received and hence the ExpStatSN would be used for that purpose (I don't really remember that well though). Eddy ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ken Craig" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 5:23 PM Subject: [Ips] StatSN question I have a question about what ExpStatSN means that I can't find an answer for in the reflector archives or in any of the RFCs. I, as an iSCSI Target running at ERL=0, send a DATA IN PDU with FINAL=1 and a StatSN of 0. I receive a SCSI CMD PDU with an ExpStatSN of 1. Does this mean that the Initiator has received the PDU BHS and all of the data or is it simply an acknowledgement that it has received the PDU BHS? Thanks, Ken Craig _______________________________________________ Ips mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips _______________________________________________ Ips mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips