RE: rationale to send PDUs in increasing CmdSn on single co nnection

Exactly thats the reason which lead me to asko this
question.

DMA optimization is possible if we can send out of
order commands to the TCP layer on single connection.

If I take pragmatic approach, 
Any idea, currently how current single connection
target implementation is?

I mean, if current targets are smart enough (accept
out of order PDUs on single connection- liberal on
point 3.2.2.1), then initiators can use their DMA
optimization.
What do you say?

Parav


--- David Sheehy <[email protected]> wrote:

> > and there was no visible motivation for out of
> order commands on a single connection 
>  
> On the contrary, there was plenty of motivation. It
> was overridden by the desire for simplified
> implementations over single TCP connections as the
> Parav conjectured. There are DMA related
> efficiencies that can be realized in situations with
> a mix of solicited and immediate/unsolicited I/O
> traffic. The folks in favor of this optimization
> were outvoted by those who wanted to simplify their
> single connection based implementations.
>  
> Dave
> 
>   _____  
> 
> From: Julian Satran
> [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 8:54 AM
> To: Parav Pandit
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Ips] rationale to send PDUs in
> increasing CmdSn on single connection
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Parav Pandit <[email protected]> wrote on
> 31/08/2007 12:52:04:
> 
> > Hi,
> >  
> > RFC 3720, section 3.2.2.1 says 
> > 
> > "On any connection, the iSCSI initiator MUST send
> the
> > commands in increasing order of CmdSN, except for
> > commands that are retransmitted due to digest
> error
> > recovery and connection recovery. "
> > 
> > (Assuming Single TCP connection ISCSI session)
> > 
> > 1. I interpret above 3.2.2.1 statement as 
> > SCSI layer gives SCSI commands to the ISCSI stack
> in
> > the order of Cmd-1 and Cmd-2. 
> > Cmd-1 will have CmdSn = 10.
> > Cmd-2 will have CmdSn = 11.
> > ISCSI stack CAN send PDUs to the TCP layer in
> > following order ONLY.
> > PDU-1 with Cmd-1.
> > PDU-2 with Cmd-2.
> > 
> > Is this correct interpretation?
> > Or
> > 
> Yes 
> > 2. On a SINGLE connection can ISCSI stack send the
> 
> > PDU-1 with Cmd-2 followed by 
> > PDU-2 with Cmd-1?
> > 
> NO
> > Assuming the answer of the question #2 is No,
> > 
> > 3. If there are multiple connections in a session
> then
> > command MAY any way reach out of order. And
> targets
> > need to wait for the previous expected commands.
> > 
> > So targets will receive out of order ISCSI PDUs
> from
> > the TCP layer and ISCSI stack handles them.
> > 
> > So then why initiators have restriction of sending
> > command in the increasing order of CmdSn on SINGLE
> TCP
> > connection?
> > 
> To simplify recovery and to...
> > Is it to simplify the implementation of targets
> > supporting only single TCP connection?
> > 
> > 
> 
> and there was no visible motivation for out of order
> commands on a single connection 
> 
> > Regards,
> > Parav Pandit
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >        
> >
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
> > Looking for a deal? Find great prices on flights
> and hotels with 
> > Yahoo! FareChase.
> >  <http://farechase.yahoo.com/>
> http://farechase.yahoo.com/
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ips mailing list
> > [email protected]
> >  <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips>
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips
> 
> 



      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Luggage? GPS? Comic books? 
Check out fitting gifts for grads at Yahoo! Search
http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=oni_on_mail&p=graduation+gifts&cs=bz


_______________________________________________
Ips mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips