RE: rationale to send PDUs in increasing CmdSn on single co nnection
Paul Koning <[email protected]> Tue, 4 Sep 2007 09:27:42 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ips |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> "Parav" == Parav Pandit <[email protected]> writes: Parav> If I take pragmatic approach, Any idea, currently how current Parav> single connection target implementation is? I suspect most of them are single connection. Parav> I mean, if current targets are smart enough (accept out of Parav> order PDUs on single connection- liberal on point 3.2.2.1), Parav> then initiators can use their DMA optimization. What do you Parav> say? Don't. You'd be creating an initiator that violates the protocol spec. You'd have no reason to expect that to work at all. Many targets will check this and call it a protocol violation (you may end up with the connection terminated). Some may not notice but may end up doing the wrong thing. paul _______________________________________________ Ips mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips