RE: NOP-IN question
"Sandars, Ken" <[email protected]> Wed, 26 Sep 2007 17:18:15 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ips |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Ken, I can't recall that limit being suggested, nor can I find anything in the docs. Given the number of reasons a Nop-In may be generated it seems like an unusual hurdle to have introduced (ping response, target-initiated ping, target soliciting ExpStatSN, target advertising new CmdSN counter values). Cheers, Ken Sandars -----Original Message----- From: Ken Craig [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, 22 September 2007 04:40 To: [email protected] Subject: [Ips] NOP-IN question During my Target development I convinced myself that somewhere in the RFC I read that only one Target originated NOP IN was allowed on the wire at a time per Connection. However I can no longer find anything like that in the latest RFC or addendums. I would like to know if I was dreaming or can someone point me to a place somewhere where the statement is made. Thanks, Ken Craig _______________________________________________ Ips mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips _______________________________________________ Ips mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips