Re: STORM BOF: Discussion topics

On Feb 12, 2009, at 12:22 PM, [email protected] wrote:

> I wrote:
>
>> I'll try to get some discussion about STORM activity started
>> on the IPS and RDDP lists - people have been entirely too
>> polite in replying to me about the BOF in private, leading
>> some IETF observers to interpret no traffic on these lists
>> as lack of interest.
>>
>> In particular, I'm hoping to get
>> some second level scoping (list of things to be done)
>> for work items including the iSCSI revision for Draft
>> Standard (what to leave out), SAM-4 support for iSCSI
>> (what to put in), and iSER revisions based on InfiniBand
>> implementations (what IETF should do vs. leave to the
>> IBTA).
>
> Here are three topics that it would be useful to discuss:
>
> - What's important/useful about new features from SAM-4.  I know
> 	that there's interest in the new task management operations,
> 	but what else?  Anything added here needs a new text key to
> 	negotiate it.

Command priority would be useful.

Status qualifiers would be nice to have, but I think are less useful  
than command priority.

Best regards,
-Steve

-- 
Steve Byan <[email protected]>


_______________________________________________
Ips mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips