Re: Datatracker State Update Notice: <draft-ietf-ipsecme-qr-ikev2-09.txt>
Tero Kivinen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ipsec |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Benjamin Kaduk writes: > On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 10:38:41PM +0200, Tero Kivinen wrote: > > Benjamin Kaduk writes: > > > It looks like the "reference" column for the registry dind't make it into > > > the -09, but I'm happy to include that change along with the last-call > > > feedback. > > > > If you are talking about the reference column of the IANA registries, > > then they are not needed in the draft (or rfc). IANA will normally add > > them automatically to the registries when doing the assignment. > > I was more interested in being clear that the new registry we're creating > should have a "Reference" column, than making sure new allocations from > existing registries get the proper reference listed. IANA will add that. Most of our previous RFCs do not explictly mention reference column when creating registry. In some cases we have that when we add to existing registry, especially if we are modifying the reference column values. > But there's plenty of time left in which to make that happen :) -- [email protected]