Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-qr-ikev2-09

Damn misclick. I meant With Nits.

On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 8:02 PM Watson Ladd via Datatracker <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Reviewer: Watson Ladd
> Review result: Not Ready
>
> Twas the night before Christmas
> when all through the house
> someone was desperately trying to get a review done on time.
>
> I didn't see anything wrong per se in the draft itself, but I found the
> capitalization of quantum computer an odd choice. IKEv2 is a complicated
> protocol, and I am not 100% sure that this draft does what we want it to:
> It
> would be great if someone could check very carefully in some symbolic
> model,
> ala what has been done in TLS. The guidance on sizes seems to rule out NIST
> level 1, but not any higher levels: might be worth calling out this
> explicitly.
>
> _______________________________________________
> secdir mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir
> wiki: http://tools.ietf.org/area/sec/trac/wiki/SecDirReview
>


-- 
"Man is born free, but everywhere he is in chains".
--Rousseau.

_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec