Re: [IPsec] [Last-Call] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection-11.txt
Paul Wouters <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.i2nsf,gmane.ietf.ipsec |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, 31 Oct 2020, Yoav Nir wrote: >> Thanks for getting back to me. What is missing from the IANA registry is the guidance as to the status of the algorithm, how highly it is recommended or not. This I-D tells people to go to RFC8247 and the IANA Registry for advice; RFC8247 gives that advice; the IANA web page does not. > > It’s possible to add a column in the IANA registry, but it is not possible to capture the information from 8247 in such a table. > > RFC 8247 has “MAY” and “SHOULD+” labels, but it also has comments and a bunch of explanation, such as that some algorithm is a SHOULD for IoT, but not otherwise. I think it’s better to point people at the RFC where the information is, rather than post very partial information in an IANA table. We do have a draft that is suggesting we add some tables :P https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pwouters-ikev1-ipsec-graveyard Paul _______________________________________________ I2nsf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf