Re: AD review of draft-moskowitz-ipsecme-ipseckey-eddsa-02

Tero Kivinen <[email protected]> Mon, 7 Nov 2022 16:07:25 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.saag,gmane.ietf.ipsec
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Robert Moskowitz writes:
> > Value  Description     	   	Format description	Reference
> > 0      No key is present				[RFC4025]
> > 1      A DSA Public Key		[RFC2536] Section 2	[RFC4025]
> > 2      A RSA Public Key 	[RFC3110] Section 2	[RFC4025]
> > 3      An ECDSA Public Key	[RFC6605] Section 4	[RFC4025]
> > TBD1   An EdDSA Public Key	[RFC8080] Section 3	[ThisRFC]
> >
> > Adding the section numbers would be useful, as those documents define
> > both DNSKEY and RRSIG resource records, so pointing to one of them
> > helps.
> I like this second way.  Does including the sec occur in any other 
> registries?  We will have to ask IANA; it does make sense as you say in 
> this specific case.

Yes. For example IKEv2 Transform Type 4 registry has section numbers
for Recipient Tests:

https://www.iana.org/assignments/ikev2-parameters/ikev2-parameters.xhtml#ikev2-parameters-8

> We would need to get IANA signoff on this, IMO.
-- 
[email protected]