Re: AD review of draft-moskowitz-ipsecme-ipseckey-eddsa-02
Tero Kivinen <[email protected]> Mon, 7 Nov 2022 16:07:25 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.saag,gmane.ietf.ipsec |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Robert Moskowitz writes: > > Value Description Format description Reference > > 0 No key is present [RFC4025] > > 1 A DSA Public Key [RFC2536] Section 2 [RFC4025] > > 2 A RSA Public Key [RFC3110] Section 2 [RFC4025] > > 3 An ECDSA Public Key [RFC6605] Section 4 [RFC4025] > > TBD1 An EdDSA Public Key [RFC8080] Section 3 [ThisRFC] > > > > Adding the section numbers would be useful, as those documents define > > both DNSKEY and RRSIG resource records, so pointing to one of them > > helps. > I like this second way. Does including the sec occur in any other > registries? We will have to ask IANA; it does make sense as you say in > this specific case. Yes. For example IKEv2 Transform Type 4 registry has section numbers for Recipient Tests: https://www.iana.org/assignments/ikev2-parameters/ikev2-parameters.xhtml#ikev2-parameters-8 > We would need to get IANA signoff on this, IMO. -- [email protected]