[CFRG] Re: [IPsec] Re: draft-kampanakis-ml-kem-ikev2
Paul Wouters <[email protected]> Tue, 27 Aug 2024 15:42:37 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.irtf.cfrg,gmane.ietf.ipsec |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAGL5yWaYUuSw=6eS5XGqU_GYYPi4huVUEC2u7VEHmpojbYU2iw@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 11:51 AM Kampanakis, Panos <kpanos= [email protected]> wrote: > CFRG had https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cfrg-schwabe-kyber/ , > https://bwesterb.github.io/draft-schwabe-cfrg-kyber/draft-cfrg-schwabe-kyber.html > for Kyber, but that was for the draft00 versions of Kyber deployed in early > TLS 1.3 codepoints. I believe the official spec for ML-KEM will be FIPS > 203. > Indeed. I was wrong. It is only for the hybrid's that have no normative references that we would need this. You are right that ml-kem would have a normative reference at NIST. My apologies for the error. Paul > _______________________________________________ CFRG mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]