Re: ipSecIfCapsTable not many attributes

Hi,

First let me say how glad I am to hear about another implementation of=20
the PIB.

My first issue is that since the ID has been through WG last call and=20
is currently in IESG review and MIB doctor review, I would not like to=20
pull it back to add a major new capability for anything less then a=20
show stopper at this point.

Further on the specific issue:

While capabilities are important, the Framework PIB has comprehensive=20
capability mechanism, that should cover the requirements.

thanks

a.

On 2 apr 2004, at 01.49, F=E9lix J.Garc=EDa Clemente wrote:

>
> Hello all,
> I am including a complete support for the Framework PIB and the IPSec
> PIB in my own COPS-PR implementation.
> I have noted that IPSec PIB includes the table ipSecIfCapsTable to
> specify capabilities that may be associated with an interface.
> This table has not many attributes, are you going to add new attributes
> or capability tables?
>
> I think this is necessary. For example, an interface may not support
> 'policy reload', i.e. to apply a policy forces to restart the=20
> interface,
> or even an attribute may specify the cryptography system supported
> (symmetric or asymmetric, or both).
>
> Regards,
> F=E9lix
>
>
>
>