RE: Uniqueness
"Andrea Westerinen" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ipsp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Casey, Different implementations have different concepts of names. MIB rows may have indexes, CIM classes have keys such as Name or InstanceID, etc. The general model tries not to specify the key/identification structure since it varies. The specific data models will certainly define identification mechanisms. Andrea -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Casey Carr Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 1:26 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Uniqueness Does the IPSec Policy Model or PCIM define how to uniquely identify an instance of a class? For example, the following is a cut an paste from the -05: 4.7.2. The Reference GroupComponent The property GroupComponent is inherited from PolicyRuleInPolicyGroup and is overridden to refer to an IPsecPolicyGroup instance. The [1..1] cardinality indicates that a SARule instance may be contained in one and only one IPsecPolicyGroup instance (i.e., SARules are not shared across IPsecPolicyGroups). What determines a unique instance of an SARule? Should the model have something similar to the INDEX definition is used in MIBs? I am currently using the rule name to uniquely identify a rule and realized that this was may not have been what was intended in the model. I did a quick review of PCIM and found no clues there either. Thanks, Casey