Re: Structure of tel: URI

Yes, I agree also.  Just pointing out the over-decadic.  I do not believe 
that things like pauses intended to compensate the difference between the 
speed of two machines locally should be included.

Follow KISS principle

Mike


At 05:52 PM 8/7/2002 +0100, Lawrence Conroy wrote:
>At 12:24 pm -0400 7/8/02, Henning Schulzrinne wrote:
>>Yes, and that's a problem that's going to be causing confusion in the 
>>future if the allocchio draft goes forward. We had, I believe, 
>>intentionally decided not to support the various pauses and such in 
>>2806bis, since they are dial strings, not directory or routing numbers. 
>>The idea was that adding pauses and such depended too strongly on the 
>>local environment to be useful in a URI.
>>
>>Michael Hammer wrote:
>>>Also, note how phone-string is being defined in:
>>>
>>>draft-allocchio-gstn-04.txt:
>
>Yup.
>Agree wholeheartedly with Henning on this.
>Dial strings are the wrong way to go.
>
>That draft is just....complex I think that the Internet Fax WG
>(from which this abomination came) are trying to solve some other problem
>- it is not at all clear to me what this is, and why they need pauses, etc.
>
>atb,   Lawrence
>--
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Roke Manor Research    : This information is provided "as is" and is not
><mailto:[email protected]>: intended to create any contractual or legal
><tel:+441794833666>    : relationship.