Re: request for iptell to review "url" IDs

"Jim Fleming" <[email protected]> Mon, 28 Oct 2002 09:01:55 -0600
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.iptel,gmane.ietf.sip,gmane.ietf.sipping
Message-ID <02f201c27e92$f589d0d0$0100a8c0@repligate>
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Scott Bradner" <[email protected]>
> 
> we would like the iptel WG to take on the following 3 IDs 
> 

.PHONE looks like a promising ID also...

851 matches for -PHONE
http://www.domainsurfer.com/ssearch.cgi?dom=-phone.com
http://root-dns.org/vuedig/vuedig_tld.php?record=NS&tld=phone&submit=Submit
Analysis : Top Level Domain PHONE exists.
Nnet : New.net Inc : 206.132.100.42
VueDig Results : Answer = 2 : Authority = 0 : Additional = 2.
phone. 1D IN NS tld1.newdotnet.net.
phone. 1D IN NS tld2.newdotnet.net.
=====

Jim Fleming
128-bit DNS is closer than you think...
http://ipv8.dyndns.tv
http://ipv8.dyns.cx
http://ipv8.no-ip.com
http://ipv8.no-ip.biz
http://ipv8.no-ip.info
http://ipv8.myip.us
http://ipv8.dyn.ee
http://ipv8.community.net.au