RE: request for iptell to review "url" IDs
"Yu, James" <[email protected]> Mon, 18 Nov 2002 11:30:10 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sipping,gmane.ietf.iptel,gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Orit, I'm not familiar with the ITU-T H.323 Annex O. I assume that h323 url is an IETF standard (e.g., an IETF registered url). So it is better to include the "user" parameter and others in this h323 url I-D. For the tel url and its existing and future extensions, a general statement about how the info. (no need to describe the exact info.) can appear in the user part when "user" parameter is present would be sufficient. Otherwise, when this h323 url I-D becomes a RFC, another I-D needs to be submitted to include the "user" parameter and others that not included in this I-D. James > -----Original Message----- > From: Orit Levin [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 10:23 AM > To: 'Yu, James' > Cc: [email protected]; 'Scott Bradner'; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: RE: request for iptell to review "url" IDs > > > James, > Actually the exact "user" parameter appears in the H.323 Annex O which > defines this and other parameters to H.323 URL. > > This Annex O is pending approval by the ITU-T because the > telephone-URI > (which it is dependant upon) hasn't been finalized yet within > the IETF. > > I will present at my ENUM presentation today this "standardization > dependencies" graph... > > BR, > Orit Levin > Chief Architect > RADVISION > Phone: +1.201.6896330 > Video: +1.201.6896430 > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Yu, James [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 9:01 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Cc: [email protected]; 'Scott Bradner'; [email protected]; > > [email protected]; [email protected] > > Subject: RE: request for iptell to review "url" IDs > > > > Orit, > > > > The h323 url I-D currently does not define a parameter similar to > > "user=phone" in the sip url to indicate that a telephone > number is in the > > user part of the h323 url. Suggest to add that in your I-D > and clarify in > > the I-D that tel url information including its extensions > can appear in > > the > > user part when a telephone number is present in the user part. > > > > James > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Scott Bradner [mailto:[email protected]] > > > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:25 AM > > > To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] > > > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; > > > [email protected]; [email protected] > > > Subject: request for iptell to review "url" IDs > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > msg from the TSV ADs > > > > > > we would like the iptel WG to take on the following 3 IDs > > > > > > draft-antti-rfc2806bis-05.txt > > > draft-yu-tel-url-06.txt > > > draft-levin-iptel-h323-url-scheme-04.txt > > > > > > we would like the WG to review the 3 IDs to be sure that > they do not > > > conflict in the use of terminology or technology and to work > > > with the ID > > > authors to resolve any conflicts > > > > > > anyone with opinions about these IDs should join the iptel > > > list and discuss > > > the issues there > > > > > > we expect that this task will be a short term one and we > can move to > > > getting these IDs published > > > > > > Scott & Allison > > > > _______________________________________________ Sipping mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments of core SIP