Re: Comments on RFC2806bis

Henning Schulzrinne wrote:

> Yu, James wrote:
> > Henning,
> >
> > Don't know whether anyone has caught this:
> >
> > In Section 4 related to "phone-context=":  change "domain" to "domainname"
> > or vice versa on the next line.
>
> Fixed in the upcoming -04.
> (http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~hgs/sip/drafts/draft-antti-rfc2806bis-04.txt)
>

The "*other" part of the global-number and local-number productions seem to have
been replaced with "*param" in "telephone-uri", however Section 5.3 still talks
about "<other>".

Question regarding naming of the "other" parameters:    Is the "m-" a prefix that
can be added to any extension parameter, or must an extension parameter be defined
and registered with an "m-" prefix from the start ?


Nit comments:
==========
Section 5.1.2:    "as as" => "as"

Section 5.3:    "in the BNF" = "in the ABNF"

Section 6:    "human- readable" => "human-readable"

Section 7.2:    `Telephone" => "Telephone" (first double-qoute formatting)


Thanks

        Flemming