RE: carrier codes in draft-rs-trip-gw-03.txt

I need more detail (not following close enough I guess)

but in general the IANA maintains registries where it assigns values

Scott

---
From [email protected]  Thu Apr 11 09:23:55 2002
From: "David R. Oran" <[email protected]>
To: "'Bob Penfield'" <[email protected]>,
   "'list iptel'" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Scott Bradner" <[email protected]>, "'Allison Mankin'" <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [IPTEL] carrier codes in draft-rs-trip-gw-03.txt
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 09:16:45 -0400
Organization: Cisco Systems
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000

If there are multiple drafts with these things, would it not be better
to create an IANA registry for these values?

For the ADs: are there some special considerations or problems with
having an IANA registry of numbers which map to (possibly by the
identity mapping) numbers whose ownership and assignment actually comes
from elsewhere?

Dave.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bob Penfield
> Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 3:26 PM
> To: list iptel
> Subject: [IPTEL] carrier codes in draft-rs-trip-gw-03.txt
> 
> 
> The carrier code attribute and address family defined in this 
> draft does not support carrier codes for anywhere other than 
> North America. It should include a country code prefix 
> similar to that proposed in draft-yu-tel-url-04.txt or 
> draft-walker-iptel-trip-tns-01.txt.
> 
> cheers,
> (-:bob
> 
> Robert F. Penfield
> Chief Software Architect
> Acme Packet, Inc.
> 130 New Boston Street
> Woburn, MA 01801
> [email protected]
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IPTEL mailing list
> [email protected] 
> http://lists.bell-> labs.com/mailman/listinfo/iptel
>