Re: Comments on RFC2806bis
Henning Schulzrinne <[email protected]> Tue, 21 May 2002 10:57:38 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.iptel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Columbia University |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> - A node does not understand "m-rn" or "m-cic" and stops processing the SIP > INVITE message > > - A node does not understand "rn" or "cic" and routes based on the phone > number > > The choice is the latter. This is because when the call arrives at a PSTN > gateway or another SIP proxy server, that gateway/server may understand "rn" > or "cic" or may be able to do another NP/800 database dip. > > I suggest that 2806bis discuss whether a node drops or keeps "unknown" > optional parameters when it receives the INVITE message and needs to send > another INVITE message out. It seems better to keep the unknown optional > parameters in the message because the next node may be able to handle it. > 2806bis is not SIP-specific, so it would not be appropriate to discuss transformations of URLs there. Generally, the normal URL rules in SIP apply. > Can the country code contain hex digits? Is there the possibility > that country codes need more than three digits? Does East Timor have its > own country code? > > [JY] > According to E.164, country codes (CCs) can be assigned > > - For geographical areas - CCs are one to three digits long. > > - For global services - CCs are always three digits long. > > - For shared international networks - CCs are always three digits long. > > In all three cases the CCs do not contain digits A thru F. > > The global routing number I have in mind will always start with "+CC" where > the CC does not contain digits A thru F and the digits after CC may contain > hex digits. So a global routing number, rn=+1-202-533-1234, would be the > same as a local routing number, rn=202-533-1234;phone-context=+1. > > May be we can use "number-context" instead of "phone-context" so that it can > be used for the phone number and routing number. I thought somebody already complained when I had accidentally changed the label to "context". If a change is acceptable, I'd rather go for the shorter "context". In the end, I don't think the name much matters, as long as the description is clear. > > James