Re: Comments on RFC2806bis

At 10:57 am -0400 21/5/02, Henning Schulzrinne wrote:
>
>I thought somebody already complained when I had accidentally 
>changed the label to "context". If a change is acceptable, I'd 
>rather go for the shorter "context". In the end, I don't think the 
>name much matters, as long as the description is clear.

To which I reply:

Hi Henning, folks,
  first, sorry for the delay; takes a time to contact people.
Speaking as the person who complained (loudly) at the change
from "phone-context", I've checked in-house.

We have two implementations with this - one for PINT and one
for SIP. I've checked with the respective developers and sales
people, and they agreed that they can handle a name change with
no problem (I thought so, but had to check :).

Hence, as the URI is getting long, if people want to change
from 'phone-context' to, for example, 'context' then that's
fine by us.

all the best,
   Lawrence
-- 
[email protected]: +44 1794 833666::<my opinions>: