Re: Comments on RFC2806bis
Lawrence Conroy <[email protected]> Thu, 23 May 2002 00:07:03 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.iptel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <p05100301b911d3d74251@[192.168.0.3]> |
At 6:38 pm -0400 22/5/02, Michael Hammer wrote: >At 05:34 PM 5/22/2002 +0100, Lawrence Conroy wrote: >>At 3:52 pm -0400 21/5/02, Michael Hammer wrote: >>>It would not be a good idea to use a local dial plan in an >>>international number format as suggested for Vienna. >>> >>>In response to my earlier posting >>>> >>>>The context is a qualifier on the applicability of the URI. It's not >>>>really more than one parameter - The single parameter 'phone-context' can >>>>have more than one value. This can happen due to introduction of >>>>relief codes, >>>>or the Vienna case, where there are two codes to dial Vienna >>>>(within Austria). >>>>Thus a Viennese phone could have two values for its phone context >>>>(01 and the >>>>old code - can't remember what this is, off hand). As an aside, >>>>the old code >>>>is not valid outside Austria, so writing this in International >>>>form is strange. >> >>To which I respond: >>Hi Mike, folks, >> >>(This may be where we get to counting the number of Angels on a pinhead :) >> >>Strictly, the old code is blocked at the International Gateway Exchange. >>Thus it can be written as a valid E.164 number; it is just blocked from >>International origination. Both versions are unambiguous, it's just that >>one is not routable from some origination points. >> >>+43-22-123456 - is this an E.164 number? >>+43-1-123456 - is this an E.164 number? >>If these are dialled from within Austria, they should terminate at the same >>'phone. If you try to dial the first variant outside Austria, it's blocked. > >I don't understand how you can call the number international if it >is blocked when dialed outside Austria. Isn't that an oxymoron of >some type? Nope. There are numbers that can be called between several networks and within a Group of Countries but are not universally available. Try phoning North Korea. An E.164 number is globally unique, not necessarily globally routable. => It's a strange one if 'tis an Oxymoron. >>Thus, I'm not sure I understand the concern. I still don't. atb, Lawrence -- [email protected]: +44 1794 833666::<my opinions>: