Re: Comments on RFC2806bis

[email protected] Thu, 23 May 2002 15:43:14 EDT
Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.iptel
Message-ID	<[email protected]>
--part1_c5.23429fb6.2a1ea052_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

In a message dated 5/23/02 1:04:55 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [email protected] 
writes:


> 
> OK, I admit it - I mistyped the code - the old code is 222, not 22. 
> Sorry about that.
> 

Yes, the 222 helps to clarify the issue - one of changing a numbering plan 
which we do a lot. So there is a period of time in which either number may be 
dialed and the call gets through. I still don't see the point of saying that 
it is allowed inside the country and blocked from outside. The period for 
allowing both to be routed should be the same for all originating points.

On the other hand, concerning the issue of too many numbers (more than 15 
now). I suspect that the reason that Vienna changed from 222 to 1 was to 
avoid the previous limit of 12, not the new 15 digit limit. I'm sure that no 
number would be assigned in Vienna which exceeds that limit (7 using the 222 
city code) until after the allowable dual dialing period. After that, the 222 
should no longer be used to route even within Austria due to the probable 
limit on the length of the digit string.

Mike


--part1_c5.23429fb6.2a1ea052_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT  SIZE=2>In a message dated 5/23/02 1:04:55 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [email protected] writes:
<BR>
<BR>
<BR><BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">
<BR>OK, I admit it - I mistyped the code - the old code is 222, not 22. 
<BR>Sorry about that.
<BR></FONT><FONT  COLOR="#000000" SIZE=3 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0"></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR></FONT><FONT  COLOR="#000000" SIZE=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0">
<BR>Yes, the 222 helps to clarify the issue - one of changing a numbering plan which we do a lot. So there is a period of time in which either number may be dialed and the call gets through. I still don't see the point of saying that it is allowed inside the country and blocked from outside. The period for allowing both to be routed should be the same for all originating points.
<BR>
<BR>On the other hand, concerning the issue of too many numbers (more than 15 now). I suspect that the reason that Vienna changed from 222 to 1 was to avoid the previous limit of 12, not the new 15 digit limit. I'm sure that no number would be assigned in Vienna which exceeds that limit (7 using the 222 city code) until after the allowable dual dialing period. After that, the 222 should no longer be used to route even within Austria due to the probable limit on the length of the digit string.
<BR>
<BR>Mike
<BR></FONT></HTML>

--part1_c5.23429fb6.2a1ea052_boundary--